📢 Gate Square Exclusive: #PUBLIC Creative Contest# Is Now Live!
Join Gate Launchpool Round 297 — PublicAI (PUBLIC) and share your post on Gate Square for a chance to win from a 4,000 $PUBLIC prize pool
🎨 Event Period
Aug 18, 2025, 10:00 – Aug 22, 2025, 16:00 (UTC)
📌 How to Participate
Post original content on Gate Square related to PublicAI (PUBLIC) or the ongoing Launchpool event
Content must be at least 100 words (analysis, tutorials, creative graphics, reviews, etc.)
Add hashtag: #PUBLIC Creative Contest#
Include screenshots of your Launchpool participation (e.g., staking record, reward
In the blockchain field, investment traps are everywhere. Many investors suffer huge losses due to a lack of discernment. However, experienced investors have summarized four key principles that can help us quickly identify most eyewash.
First principle: Focus on problem-solving ability
Truly valuable Blockchain projects typically can clearly identify the specific industry problems they aim to solve. For example, some projects are dedicated to using Blockchain technology for product traceability to combat counterfeit goods; others focus on enhancing the credibility of government data sharing. The core of these projects lies in their application value, rather than the technology itself. In contrast, those projects that only shout hollow slogans but cannot explain specific application scenarios often struggle to materialize.
Second Guideline: Beware of promises of "guaranteed profits without losses".
The basic principle of financial markets is that returns are proportional to risk. Whether it's stocks, funds, or government bonds, returns are subject to fluctuations. Compliance investments related to Blockchain, such as digital assets or tech equity, carry both risks and opportunities. Therefore, any project that claims "guaranteed profits" should be treated with high caution.
Third Guideline: Prudently assess the project team.
Real Blockchain projects are often led by teams with relevant industry backgrounds and technical expertise. These team members usually have publicly available professional resumes that can be verified. In contrast, teams that hide their identities or exaggerate their resumes are often difficult to trust.
Fourth criterion: Focus on the actual progress of the project.
Valuable Blockchain projects typically have a clear development roadmap and regularly update their progress. They may already have initial product prototypes or are conducting field tests. In contrast, projects that only have concepts without substantial progress are more likely to be eyewash.
By following these guidelines, investors can better identify truly valuable Blockchain projects and avoid falling into the traps of eyewash. However, even so, Blockchain investments still carry risks, and investors should act cautiously, conducting thorough research and risk assessments.